Daggett can't win. So why is he in this?

I continue to struggle to understand the candidacy of Chris Daggett. He is an independent candidate for governor and he is polling between 5-17 percent depending on whose poll you are looking at. Of course, I will likely get a comment on this about how he is charging and is going to win the race (and the email of the commenter will be a link to the Daggett campaign). But we are now late in the race and he has no chance of winning. So why does he continue?

Does he have aspirations to run for another office sometime in the future? Not sure. This isn't like the national stage where a big run here will equite to a book and speaking tour. And increased awareness. But it doesn't make sense here. The minute he loses in November he is once again a nobody except among party faithful - oops, he represents no political party so that logic is out. Run for something else? Democrats aren't going to stick to him long and Republicans will brand him toxic for splitting the anti-Corzine vote. No future in that either.

So what is left? The nagging feeling I keep getting is that his candidacy only serves to help one person and one person only. Jon Corzine. To that end, I tried to review Daggett's election filings. They can be accessed here. The only obvious trend I was able to take from an analysis of his donors was that they significantly trend toward one industry - financial services. I checked Christie's donors to see if I could get the same trend however I didn't see the same thing there. Another thing concerned me about Daggett's donors. They haven't increased as his awareness has increased. As a matter of fact, his big ticket donors seem to have dried up. Contribution limits or something else?

Do I believe that Corzine has set up Daggett as a stalking horse in this race? I doubt it. But would I accept the notion that Corzine's people arranged for a third party candidate to receive enough funding to damage his opponent? You bet.

---